Rebel Satoshi Arcade
Smart Contract Audit Report
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80cdd/80cdd0c100a3e0d90cde6b0cd2fc6a38f9066e81" alt="Rebel Satoshi Arcade Audit Report"
Executive Summary
This report presents the outcomes of our collaborative engagement with the Rebel Satoshi team, focusing on the comprehensive evaluation of the RebelSatoshiArcade contract.
Our team conducted an initial security assessment from March 19th to March 21st, 2024.
Rebel Satoshi is a new ERC-20 token deployed on Ethereum. Its purpose is to underpin all transactions, purchases, fees, and rewards within the wider Rebel Satoshi universe.
Audit Scope
Name |
Source Code |
Visualized |
RebelSatoshiArcade |
Name |
Address/Source Code |
Visualized |
RebelSatoshiArcade |
Audit Findings
Informational findings were identified and the team may want to review them. In addition, some centralized aspects are present.
Finding #1 |
RebelSatoshiArcade |
InformationalOpen |
Finding #1 - RebelSatoshiArcade
|
||
Description: The Recommendation: The above state variables could be declared immutable for additional gas savings on each reference. |
||
Finding #2 |
RebelSatoshiArcade |
InformationalOpen |
Finding #2 - RebelSatoshiArcade
|
||
Description: Although the SafeMath library is utilized, the contract is deployed with Solidity v0.8.17 which has built-in overflow checks. Recommendation: SafeMath could be safely removed to reduce contract size, deployment costs, and gas costs on all transactions that utilize it. |
System Overview
TOKENOMICSThe total supply of the token is set to 3 billion $RECQ (3,000,000,000) with the entire supply being minted directly to the specified owner's address upon deployment. After deployment, minting is no longer accessible. No burn functions are accessible though the total supply of the token can be reduced by transferring tokens to the 0x..dead address.
AUTOMATIC LIQUIDITY ADDSWhen the contract executes a transfer that is classified as a sell, and the swapping functionality has been enabled by the owner, several conditions are evaluated to initiate an automatic liquidity add. This process executes only if the contract's token balance reaches the predetermined threshold and no swap is currently in progress. Half of the threshold's token value is swapped for ETH, which is then transferred back to the contract. This received ETH is then paired with the other half of the tokens and subsequently added as liquidity to the RECQ-ETH pair.
The LP tokens received through the automatic liquidity add process are sent to the contract. As the owner can withdraw any tokens from the contract at any time, we recommend the team lock these newly acquired LP tokens. There are no fees associated with transferring tokens. Tokens must be manually supplied to the contract in order for swaps to be able to occur.
OWNERSHIP CONTROLSThe owner can set the threshold number of tokens in the contract needed to perform an automatic liquidity add to any value up to 3 billion (100% of the total supply). The owner can enable/disable the automatic liquidity add functionality at any time. The owner can add/remove any address as an Automated Market Maker Pair address at any time. The owner can withdraw any tokens or ETH from the contract at any time.
Vulnerability Analysis
Vulnerability Category | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
Arbitrary Jump/Storage Write | N/A | PASS |
Centralization of Control | The LP tokens received through the automatic liquidity add process are sent to the contract. The owner can withdraw any tokens from the contract at any time. | PASS |
Compiler Issues | N/A | PASS |
Delegate Call to Untrusted Contract | N/A | PASS |
Dependence on Predictable Variables | N/A | PASS |
Ether/Token Theft | N/A | PASS |
Flash Loans | N/A | PASS |
Front Running | N/A | PASS |
Improper Events | N/A | PASS |
Improper Authorization Scheme | N/A | PASS |
Integer Over/Underflow | N/A | PASS |
Logical Issues | N/A | PASS |
Oracle Issues | N/A | PASS |
Outdated Compiler Version | N/A | PASS |
Race Conditions | N/A | PASS |
Reentrancy | N/A | PASS |
Signature Issues | N/A | PASS |
Sybil Attack | N/A | PASS |
Unbounded Loops | N/A | PASS |
Unused Code | N/A | PASS |
Overall Contract Safety | PASS |
About SourceHat
SourceHat has quickly grown to have one of the most experienced and well-equipped smart contract auditing teams in the industry. Our team has conducted 1800+ solidity smart contract audits covering all major project types and protocols, securing a total of over $50 billion U.S. dollars in on-chain value!
Our firm is well-reputed in the community and is trusted as a top smart contract auditing company for the review of solidity code, no matter how complex. Our team of experienced solidity smart contract auditors performs audits for tokens, NFTs, crowdsales, marketplaces, gambling games, financial protocols, and more!
Contact us today to get a free quote for a smart contract audit of your project!
What is a SourceHat Audit?
Typically, a smart contract audit is a comprehensive review process designed to discover logical errors, security vulnerabilities, and optimization opportunities within code. A SourceHat Audit takes this a step further by verifying economic logic to ensure the stability of smart contracts and highlighting privileged functionality to create a report that is easy to understand for developers and community members alike.
How Do I Interpret the Findings?
Each of our Findings will be labeled with a Severity level. We always recommend the team resolve High, Medium, and Low severity findings prior to deploying the code to the mainnet. Here is a breakdown on what each Severity level means for the project:
- High severity indicates that the issue puts a large number of users' funds at risk and has a high probability of exploitation, or the smart contract contains serious logical issues which can prevent the code from operating as intended.
- Medium severity issues are those which place at least some users' funds at risk and has a medium to high probability of exploitation.
- Low severity issues have a relatively minor risk association; these issues have a low probability of occurring or may have a minimal impact.
- Informational issues pose no immediate risk, but inform the project team of opportunities for gas optimizations and following smart contract security best practices.